刘意¹,冯倩倩²,赵佳阳^3,4

• 1:中共济南市委党校
• 2:山东大学管理学院
• 3:中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
• 4:中国科学院大学

摘要(Abstract)：

结合隐私计算理论、计划行为理论、多维发展理论等多个理论框架，从个人、人际与环境等维度对隐私悖论现象的成因进行全面解释。应用QCA方法，对收集到的500份有效问卷进行实证分析，探究因素组合的组态效应，从组态视角分析诱发隐私悖论现象的等效路径。实证分析结果显示，有三条路径可以导致隐私悖论现象发生，分别为收益驱动型路径、倦怠抑制型路径、风险与收益权衡型路径。研究结果表明，隐私悖论现象是个人、人际与环境等多维因素共同作用的结果，存在多条殊途同归的等效因果链。研究对解释隐私悖论成因的“黑箱”，以及帮助制定科学合理、切实有效的隐私保护政策等，具有重要理论与现实意义。

关键词(KeyWords)： 隐私悖论;自我表露;隐私计算;计划行为理论;多维发展理论;QCA

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“基于关联关系动态融合的主权债务危机跨国传染路径研究”（72401164）； 山东省自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“人才强省背景下青年科技人才发展环境优化路径研究”（ZR2024QG114）。

作者(Author): 刘意¹,冯倩倩²,赵佳阳^3,4

DOI: 10.19524/j.cnki.10-1009/g3.2026.02.104

参考文献(References)：

• [1] 中央网络安全和信息化委员会. “十四五”国家信息化规划. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/202112/28/5664873/files1760823a103e4d75ac681564fe481af4.pdf. （2021-12-27） [2024-7-28].
  [2] 企鹅智酷. 中国网民个人隐私状况调查报告. https://www.199it.com/archives/761423.html. （2018-08-15） [2024-08-17].
  [3] Barness B. A Privacy Paradox: Social Networking in the United States. First Monday, 2006, 11(9): 5–16
  [4] 沈旺, 高雪倩, 代旺, 等. 基于解释水平理论与调节定向理论的社交网络隐私悖论研究. 情报科学, 2020, 38(8): 120–127, 140
  [5] Adorjan M, Ricciardelli R. A New Privacy Paradox? Youth Agentic Practices of Privacy Management Despite “Nothing to Hide” Online. Canadian Review of Sociology, 2019, 56(1): 8–29
  [6] Lee J M, Rha J Y. Personalization Privacy Paradox and Consumer Conflict with the Use of Location-based Mobile Commerce. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 63: 453–462
  [7] Fox G. "To Protect My Health or to Protect My Health Privacy?" A Mixed-methods Investigation of the Privacy Paradox. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2020, 71(9): 1015–1029
  [8] 吴丁娟, 朱侯. 二元态度下的网购消费者隐私悖论形成机制. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(8): 160–165
  [9] Guo X, Zhang X, Sun Y. The Privacy Personalization Paradox in Mhealth Services Acceptance of Different Age Groups. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2016, 16: 55–65
  [10] 谢兴政, 蔡念中, 黄志铭, 等. 社交媒体用户隐私悖论行为影响因素初探. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(18): 55–63
  [11] 张晓娟, 田馨滦. 移动社交媒体用户隐私悖论现象的产生路径研究——基于fsQCA的实证分析. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(11): 92–97
  [12] 孙锐, 朱秋华, 王伟, 等. 言行不一?态度元认知视角下在线用户“隐私悖论”研究:ERPs证据. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(6): 235–248
  [13] Laufer R S, Wolfe M. Privacy as a Concept and a Social Issue: A Multidimensional Developmental Theory. Journal of Social Issues, 1977, 33(3): 22–42
  [14] Xu H, Dinev T, Smith H J, et al. Examing the Formation of Individual’s Privacy Concerns: Toward an Integrative View. ICIS 2008 Proceedings, 2008: 6.
  [15] 薛可, 何佳, 余明阳. 社会化媒体中隐私悖论的影响因素研究. 当代传播, 2016(1): 34–38
  [16] 李海丹, 洪紫怡, 朱侯. 隐私计算与公平理论视角下用户隐私披露行为机制研究. 图书情报知识, 2016(6): 114–124
  [17] 牛静, 孟筱筱. 社交媒体信任对隐私风险感知和自我表露的影响:网络人际信任的中介效应. 国际新闻界, 2019, 41(7): 91–109
  [18] Hew J J, Tan G W H, Lin B, et al. Generating Travel-related Contents through Mobile Social Tourism: Does Privacy Paradox Persist. Telematics and Informatics, 2017, 34(7): 914–935
  [19] Cho I, Kim J K, Park H, et al. Motivations of Facebook Places and Store Atmosphere as Moderator. Industrial Management Data Systems, 2014, 114(9): 1360–1377
  [20] 孙超群. 微博平台隐私悖论现象影响因素研究. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2021.
  [21] Krasnova H, Veltri n F, Profoliver G. Self-disclosure and Privacy Calculus on Social Networking Sites: The Role of Culture. Business& Information Systems Engineering, 2012, 4(3): 127–135
  [22] Culman M J. Hoe Did They Get My Name? An Exploratory Investigation of Consumer Attitudes toward Secondary Information Use. MIS Quarterly, 1993, 17(3): 341–364
  [23] Hardy G E, Shapiro D A, Borrill C S. Fatigue in the Workforce of National Health Service Trusts: Levels of Symptomatology and Links with Minor Psychiatric Disorder, Demographic, Occupational and Work Role Factors. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1997, 43(1): 83–92
  [24] Lutz C, Hoffmann C P, Ranzini G. Data Capitalism and the User: An Exploration of Privacy Cynicism in Germany. New Media & Society, 2020, 22(7): 1168–1187
  [25] Chen H T. Revisiting the Privacy Paradox on Social Media with an Extended Privacy Calculus Model: The Effect of Privacy Concerns, Privacy Self-efficacy, and Social Capital on Privacy Management. American Behavioral Scientist, 2018, 62(10): 1392–1412
  [26] Li H, Luo X R, Zhang J, et al. Resolving the Privacy Paradox: Toward a Cognitive Appraisal and Emotion Approach to Online Privacy Behaviors. Information & Management, 2017, 54(8): 1012–1022
  [27] Zlatolas L N, Welzer T, Heričko M, et al. Privacy Antecedents for SNS Self-disclosure: The Case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 45: 158–167
  [28] 乔翘. 互联网使用中的隐私顾虑、倦怠与保护策略研究. 太原: 山西大学, 2023.
  [29] 聂永浩, 罗景月. 感知有用性、信任与社交网站用户的个人信息披露意愿. 图书情报知识, 2013(5): 89–97
  [30] Hllenbugh E E, Ferris A L. Facebook Self-disclosure: Examining the Role of Traits, Social Cohesion, and Motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014(30): 50–58
  [31] Fogel J, Nehmad E. Internet Social Network Communities: Risk Taking, Trust, and Privacy Concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, 25(1): 153–160
  [32] 袁向玲, 牛静. 社交媒体隐私政策与用户自我表露的实证研究: 一个被调节的中介模型. 信息资源管理学报, 2021, 11(1): 49–58
  [33] 中国互联网络信息中心. 第47次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》. https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2022/0401/c88-1125.html. [2021-02-03].
  [34] 中国互联网络信息中心. 第52次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》. https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/ 2023/0828/c88-10829.html. [2023-08-28].
  [35] Ragin C C. Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage. Political Analysis, 2006, 14(3): 291–310
  [36] Fiss P C. Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2): 393–420
  [37] 张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用: 定位、策略和方向. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9): 1312–1323
  [38] Schneider C Q, Wagemann C. Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: University Press, 2012.