王大可^1,2,周凯琳¹

• 1:上海交通大学媒体与传播学院
• 2:上海交通大学智能传播研究院

摘要(Abstract)：

高校学生是AI辅助写作工具的密集使用者，又处于学术规范养成期，考察其在真实写作任务中应对AI幻觉的过程具有重要现实意义。本研究采用事件导向型日记法，收集高校学生在真实学术任务中遭遇AI幻觉的过程性记录，发现AI幻觉集中于文献查找、数据核查等高精度任务，其“表面拟真性”可拆解为格式、数据、来源、逻辑和语言五个维度。用户借助形式异常、内容矛盾等线索识别幻觉，辅以数据库查证、原文对照、交叉AI验证等手段，但识别效能受到知识储备与时间压力的制约。面对AI输出的不确定性，用户发展出基于任务特征的“功能性信任”模式，将整体性评估转变为差异化配置。

关键词(KeyWords)： AI幻觉;表面拟真性;人机信任;学术写作;AI辅助写作

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社科基金重大项目“5G时代新闻传播的格局变迁与研究范式转型”（21&ZD325）；上海市哲学社会科学规划一般项目“人工智能传播的‘双智能’共振风险防范与‘人机共生’新生态规制研究”（2023BXW002）。

作者(Author): 王大可^1,2,周凯琳¹

DOI: 10.19524/j.cnki.10-1009/g3.2026.02.051

参考文献(References)：

• [1] 蔡芬, 贾枭, 沈文钦. 生成式人工智能在我国研究生学术写作中的应用现状及其影响. 中国高教研究, 2025(1): 75–82
  [2] 郭全中, 张磊, 韦薇. AI幻觉的生成机理与敏捷治理. 新闻爱好者, 2026(2): 36–41
  [3] 胡健雄. AI幻觉的社会风险: 现实样态、生成机理与治理进路. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2026, 47(2): 49–59
  [4] 刘霞. “幻觉引文”悄然侵蚀公众对科学的信任. 科技日报, 2026-04-11（4）.
  [5] 李新月, 练靖雯, 朱庆华, 等. 迈向可信人工智能: 社会技术系统视角下生成式AI幻觉研究综述. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1762.G3.20260415.1403.002[2026-04-29].
  [6] GUAN J, DODGE J, WADDEN D, et al. Language Models Hallucinate, but May Excel at Fact Verification. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1: Long Papers. Mexico City: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024: 1090-1111.
  [7] WALTERS W H, WILDER E I. Fabrication and Errors in the Bibliographic Citations Generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 14045
  [8] SUN Y J, SHENG D F, ZHOU Z H, et al. AI Hallucination: towards a Comprehensive Classification of Distorted Information in Artificial Intelligence-generated Content. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 2024, 11(1): 1278
  [9] JONES N. AI Hallucinations Can't Be Stopped — but These Techniques Can Limit Their Damage. Nature, 2025, 637(8047): 778–780
  [10] SHAO A. New Sources of Inaccuracy? A Conceptual Framework for Studying AI Hallucinations. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/new-sources-of-inaccuracy-a-conceptual-framework-for-studying-ai-hallucinations/[2026-04-29].
  [11] 喻国明, 金丽萍, 刘佳颖. 大语言模型下机器的幻觉与人机信任构建机制探讨. 未来传播, 2025, 32(2): 2–10+128
  [12] LI Y G, WU B Z, HUANG Y Q, et al. Developing Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: Insights from Research on Interpersonal, Human-automation, and Human-AI trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 2024, 15: 1382693
  [13] JACOVI A, MARASOVIC A, MILLER T, et al. Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency （FAccT’21）. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021: 624-635.
  [14] LIM C. DeBiasMe: De-biasing Human-AI Interactions with Metacognitive AIED （AI in Education） Interventions. arXiv: 2504.16770 [2026-04-29].
  [15] LI W, BROOKS C. Influence on Judgements of Learning Given Perceived AI Annotations. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale （L@S ’24）. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024: 221-231.
  [16] ARGUEDAS A A R, BADRINATHAN S, MONT'ALVERNE C, et al. Shortcuts to Trust: Relying on Cues to Judge Online News from Unfamiliar Sources on Digital Platforms. Journalism, 2024, 25(6): 1207–1229
  [17] STEVENS A F, STETSON P. Theory of Trust and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Technology (TrAAIT): An Instrument to Assess Clinician Trust and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2023, 148: 104550
  [18] KAPLAN A D, KESSLER T T, BRILL J C, et al. Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Meta-analytic Findings. Human Factors, 2023, 65(2): 337–359
  [19] 储节旺, 罗怡帆, 李佳轩. AIGC对信息生成方式及用户信息行为的影响. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(24): 13–23
  [20] BOLGER N, DAVIS A, RAFAELI E. Diary Methods: Capturing Life as It Is Lived// FISKE S T. Annual Review of Psychology: Vol. 54. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, 2003: 579-616.
  [21] LEWIS P R, MARSH S. What Is It Like to Trust a Rock? AFunctionalistPerspective on Trust and Trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence. Cognitive Systems Research, 2022, 72: 33–49
  [22] LEE J D, SEE K A. Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors, 2004, 46(1): 50–80